<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Are social networking sites for Boomers stickier?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/</link>
	<description>In HR and Talent Acquisition, People ARE The Social Media</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 21 Jun 2010 13:17:04 -0700</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Obbop</title>
		<link>http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/comment-page-1/#comment-143939</link>
		<dc:creator>Obbop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Jan 2009 23:12:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/#comment-143939</guid>
		<description>As folks age I believe there is a general tendency to stick closer to home. As age delivers physical infirmities for many the desire to be out and about after work diminishes. The chair at the abode calls for use and with a nearby computer it also cries out &quot;Use me.&quot;

Thus, as the current generation ages I expect more Web sites to cater to us old fogies.

As for &quot;stickiness&quot; perhaps moderation by users, however that moderation is implemented, could reduce the users driven away by whatever negatives tend to drive desirable users to depart for the pastures that are proverbially greener.

If I was implementing a social site for old geezers, old farts, the ancient crotchety ones, I would implement a voting system for registered users. Comments, submitted essays, etc. could be voted upon, perhaps a basic up/down vote system and those amassing too many negative votes would be warned and eventually banned if that poster angered too many folks. That&#039;s but one of many possible ideas to keep the masses coming back.

http://obbop.wordpress.com/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As folks age I believe there is a general tendency to stick closer to home. As age delivers physical infirmities for many the desire to be out and about after work diminishes. The chair at the abode calls for use and with a nearby computer it also cries out &#8220;Use me.&#8221;</p>
<p>Thus, as the current generation ages I expect more Web sites to cater to us old fogies.</p>
<p>As for &#8220;stickiness&#8221; perhaps moderation by users, however that moderation is implemented, could reduce the users driven away by whatever negatives tend to drive desirable users to depart for the pastures that are proverbially greener.</p>
<p>If I was implementing a social site for old geezers, old farts, the ancient crotchety ones, I would implement a voting system for registered users. Comments, submitted essays, etc. could be voted upon, perhaps a basic up/down vote system and those amassing too many negative votes would be warned and eventually banned if that poster angered too many folks. That&#8217;s but one of many possible ideas to keep the masses coming back.</p>
<p><a href="http://obbop.wordpress.com/" rel="nofollow">http://obbop.wordpress.com/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shannon</title>
		<link>http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/comment-page-1/#comment-46827</link>
		<dc:creator>Shannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 13 Sep 2007 15:07:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.exceler8ion.com/2007/09/13/are-social-networking-sites-for-boomers-stickier/#comment-46827</guid>
		<description>&lt;p&gt;Interesting you posted this Jules as Eons just announced today that they are laying off 1/3 of their staff - http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/12/eons-announces-big-layoffs-as-company-refocuses-on-social-networking-it-was-kind-of-like-survivor/!  Quote from the article:&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;blockquote&gt;&lt;p&gt;Eonsâ€™ site right now has nine major categories: people, fun, love, money, body, lifepath, obits, games, and travel. According to the company and our source, it will no longer pursue areas like obits (offering online obits was a core premise of Eons at its founding) and travel, which are time consuming and costly to keep updated with fresh content. â€œObits and travel, theyâ€™re just probably going to be spun off,â€ the source said. â€œThey really need more investment, more concentrated focus.â€&lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Going forward, Eons will focus on the community-building and social-networking aspects of the site, found mainly in its people section, which among other things hosts a collection of blogs and user groups dedicated to topics like games, romance, health, and investing. While Eons as a whole has been struggling, â€œThe community is thriving,â€ our source says.&lt;/blockquote&gt;&lt;br /&gt;
Interesting there is no mention of jobs there.  &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;Does this mean that Social Networking for Boomers is bunk?  I don&#039;t think so.  There are other &quot;boomers focused&quot; social networking sites out there - http://www.boomj.com/ and even http://www.gather.com (no, NOT just for boomers - but its their main demo). &lt;/p&gt;
&lt;p&gt;In general, I think that we are seeing an overall cultural change because of technology and people regardless of age are using technology to make connecting and building relationships more efficient.  There will be some contractions in the process, but clearly the adoption is happening with people (though not yet by most &#039;corporations&#039;).&lt;/p&gt;
</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Interesting you posted this Jules as Eons just announced today that they are laying off 1/3 of their staff &#8211; <a href="http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/12/eons-announces-big-layoffs-as-company-refocuses-on-social-networking-it-was-kind-of-like-survivor/" rel="nofollow">http://www.xconomy.com/2007/09/12/eons-announces-big-layoffs-as-company-refocuses-on-social-networking-it-was-kind-of-like-survivor/</a>!  Quote from the article:</p>
<blockquote><p>Eonsâ€™ site right now has nine major categories: people, fun, love, money, body, lifepath, obits, games, and travel. According to the company and our source, it will no longer pursue areas like obits (offering online obits was a core premise of Eons at its founding) and travel, which are time consuming and costly to keep updated with fresh content. â€œObits and travel, theyâ€™re just probably going to be spun off,â€ the source said. â€œThey really need more investment, more concentrated focus.â€</p>
<p>Going forward, Eons will focus on the community-building and social-networking aspects of the site, found mainly in its people section, which among other things hosts a collection of blogs and user groups dedicated to topics like games, romance, health, and investing. While Eons as a whole has been struggling, â€œThe community is thriving,â€ our source says.</p>
</blockquote>
<p>
Interesting there is no mention of jobs there.  </p>
<p>Does this mean that Social Networking for Boomers is bunk?  I don&#8217;t think so.  There are other &#8220;boomers focused&#8221; social networking sites out there &#8211; <a href="http://www.boomj.com/" rel="nofollow">http://www.boomj.com/</a> and even <a href="http://www.gather.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.gather.com</a> (no, NOT just for boomers &#8211; but its their main demo). </p>
<p>In general, I think that we are seeing an overall cultural change because of technology and people regardless of age are using technology to make connecting and building relationships more efficient.  There will be some contractions in the process, but clearly the adoption is happening with people (though not yet by most &#8216;corporations&#8217;).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
